Leaders Must Show Up Where AI Is Looking

When someone researches your company, they used to start with Google.

They'd look at your website. Check LinkedIn profiles. Maybe read a few articles where your company was mentioned. The research path was predictable: search engines, social platforms, maybe some industry publications.

That still happens. But now there's another layer. People are asking AI.

"Who are the leading voices in pharmaceutical transformation?" "Which executives should I follow for insights on regulatory strategy?" "What companies are actually making progress on sustainability?" These aren't Google searches anymore. They're conversations with ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. And AI answers based on what it can find.

If your leadership team isn't visible online, AI won't recommend you. It can't. Because there's nothing for it to reference.

How AI research actually works

When someone asks ChatGPT for recommendations, it doesn't browse the web the way a person would. It synthesizes information from what it's been trained on and what it can access. It looks for signals: published content, LinkedIn activity, articles, interviews, thought leadership. It weighs credibility based on consistency and presence.

If your CEO has written articles, shared insights, and engaged in industry conversation, AI has material to work with. It can say, "Here's someone worth following because they've demonstrated expertise over time."

If your CEO is silent, AI has nothing. It can't recommend someone who hasn't shown up.

This isn't a hypothetical problem. Right now, candidates are asking AI which companies have strong leadership. Investors are asking AI who the credible voices are in specific sectors. Partners are using AI to research which executives they should connect with. And if your team isn't visible, you're not in those recommendations.

The Google + AI research path

Research used to be linear. Someone would Google your company, look at your website, maybe check LinkedIn. They controlled the path.

Now it's conversational. They ask AI a question and get a synthesized answer. They don't visit ten websites—they get one response that pulls from multiple sources. And that response either includes you or it doesn't.

Here's what that looks like in practice:

Old path:

• Google "top fintech executives"
• Click through results
• Read profiles, decide who seems credible
• Follow a few people on LinkedIn

New path:

• Ask ChatGPT "Who should I follow for fintech industry insights?"
• Get a list of names with context
• Go directly to those profiles
• Done

The difference is speed and curation. AI is doing the filtering. And if you're not in the training data or accessible content that AI pulls from, you don't make the list.

What makes someone "findable" to AI

AI doesn't have opinions. It has patterns. It recognizes who shows up consistently, who engages with relevant topics, who has a body of work that demonstrates expertise.

This means visibility isn't just for humans anymore. It's for the systems humans are using to make decisions.

If your executives are active on LinkedIn, publishing insights, contributing to industry conversation, AI can reference that. If they've been quoted in articles, written thought leadership, or spoken at events that generated content, AI has material to work with.

If they're silent, they're invisible. Not just to people, but to the tools people use to research companies and leaders.

The talent research example

When candidates are considering a company, they research differently now.

They still check Glassdoor and LinkedIn. But increasingly, they're asking AI: "What's the leadership like at [Company]?" "Who's the CEO and what do they care about?" "Is this a company with visible, credible executives?"

AI answers based on what it can find. If your CEO has been sharing perspectives on transformation, culture, or industry challenges, AI can say, "Here's what their leadership cares about." If there's nothing, the answer is vague or generic.

This affects who applies. The best candidates want to work for leaders they can see and respect. If your executives aren't visible, you're losing candidates before they even consider applying.

The investor and partner research dynamic

Investors ask AI to summarize leadership teams. Partners use AI to identify who's credible in specific markets. Industry analysts use AI to research who's shaping conversation.

In every case, visibility matters. Not because AI cares about your brand, but because it synthesizes what's publicly available. And if your team hasn't built a presence, there's nothing to synthesize.

The companies that are winning aren't just thinking about Google SEO anymore. They're thinking about how their leadership shows up across the full research landscape: search engines, social platforms, and now AI systems that are increasingly becoming the first stop for anyone trying to understand who's credible in an industry.

What changes when you're visible to AI

When your leadership team has built consistent, public presence, AI can reference it. And that changes how people encounter your company.

Instead of your company being a name they have to research, it comes with context. "This is a company led by someone who's been contributing to the industry conversation for years." "Here's an executive who's written about the exact challenges you're asking about." "This team has demonstrated credibility over time."

That perception shift matters. It's the difference between being unknown and being pre-vetted. Between needing to prove yourself and already having third-party validation built in.

The infrastructure challenge

Making your leadership team visible to AI isn't about gaming algorithms. It's about building the same infrastructure you'd build for any other strategic priority: consistent content, clear positioning, sustained presence.

This means executives need to be active where AI can find them. LinkedIn is the obvious starting point—it's public, indexed, and referenced heavily. Industry publications matter. Podcasts and interviews generate transcripts that AI can access. Thought leadership on your company blog creates material AI can pull from.

But it also means consistency. One article doesn't make someone findable. A pattern does. AI recognizes who shows up repeatedly, not who had one big moment.

The organizations that are adapting

The most sophisticated companies aren't waiting to see how this plays out. They're already building visibility with AI research in mind.

They're ensuring their executives have active LinkedIn profiles with regular content. They're getting leaders published in industry outlets. They're creating systems that make visibility sustainable, so there's always fresh material for AI to reference.

And they're doing it because they've recognized that research has changed. It's not just about being findable on Google anymore. It's about being part of the conversation in ways that AI can see, synthesize, and recommend.

What's at stake

If you're not visible to AI, you're not visible to the people using AI. And increasingly, that's everyone.

Candidates researching companies. Investors evaluating leadership teams. Partners deciding who to work with. Journalists looking for credible sources. All of them are using AI to speed up research and filter options.

If your leadership team hasn't built public presence, you're not just losing visibility. You're losing opportunities before you even know they existed.

The advantage is still available

The good news is most companies haven't figured this out yet. Most leadership teams are still invisible online. Most organizations haven't connected the dots between executive visibility and AI-driven research.

Which means the companies that move now will have a meaningful advantage. They'll be the ones AI recommends. The ones that show up in candidate research. The ones investors and partners find when they're looking for credible leadership.

But that window won't stay open forever. As more organizations recognize how research is changing, visibility will become table stakes. The advantage will go to the companies that started building it early.

Moving forward

Visibility used to be about humans finding you. Now it's about humans and AI finding you. And that changes what effective presence looks like.

It's not enough to have a LinkedIn profile. You need consistent activity. It's not enough to have been quoted once. You need a pattern of contribution. It's not enough to be credible internally. You need to be visible externally in ways that AI can reference.

The companies that understand this are building executive visibility as infrastructure—not because it's trendy, but because it's how modern research works. And the ones that don't will keep wondering why their competitors are attracting better talent, forming stronger partnerships, and getting recommended when they're not.

The answer is simple: AI is looking. And if you're not visible, it can't find you.

Disclaimer:

This article reflects observations on digital visibility and AI-driven research and does not constitute professional technology, legal, or compliance advice. Companies should evaluate visibility strategies in alignment with their specific operational and regulatory requirements.

Learn more about Ripple™

If this topic resonated with you, explore how Ripple™ helps leaders turn ideas into influence:

• Learn more about our Personal Brand Management system built for executives who want consistent visibility without extra time.
• Discover how we create Corporate Visibility at Scale helping entire leadership teams show up with clarity and credibility.
• Read more insights in our News & Insights section, where Ripple™ shares strategies for leadership visibility in the age of AI.

You can also learn more About Ripple™ who we are, what we believe in, and how we help leaders build lasting influence.

At Ripple™, we turn leadership into leverage through personal branding, visibility systems, and storytelling that travels further.

📩 Get in touch at joost@majortale.com to explore how we can help.